Irom Sharmila: 15 Years After Her Hunger Strike — What Changed and What Didn't
Irom Sharmila: 15 Years After Her Hunger Strike — What Changed and What Didn't
What's in this post
- Why she started — November 2, 2000
- What 16 years of a hunger strike actually looked like
- Why she ended the fast and what happened next
- The election result that broke everything
- Where Irom Sharmila is today
- AFSPA in 2026 — still there, still contested
- Her legacy — what she actually changed
- The questions her life leaves unanswered
Why She Started — November 2, 2000
The story of Irom Sharmila's hunger strike begins not with a political calculation but with a massacre at a bus stop.
On November 2, 2000, in Malom — a small town near Imphal in Manipur — personnel from the Assam Rifles opened fire at a crowded bus stop, killing ten civilians who were waiting for their transport home. Among the dead were a 62-year-old woman and Sinam Chandramani, an 18-year-old who had been awarded the National Bravery Award just two years earlier. The victims were not militants, not armed, not fleeing. They were waiting for a bus.
Three days later, on November 5, 2000, a 28-year-old woman named Irom Chanu Sharmila sat down near the site of the killings and announced she would fast until the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act was repealed. She stopped eating. She stopped drinking water. She refused to brush her teeth or comb her hair — a deliberate act of total renunciation in the Gandhian tradition.
Within three days, she was arrested by the Manipur Police under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code — the provision that makes "attempt to commit suicide" a criminal offence. She was taken to Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital in Imphal, where doctors inserted a nasal tube and began force-feeding her liquid nutrients. She would remain in that condition — a prisoner, force-fed, technically under arrest for "attempted suicide" — for the next sixteen years.
"I am not a terrorist. I am not a criminal. I am a human being who loves her people and cannot bear to watch them suffer under a law that gives soldiers the right to kill without accountability." — Irom Sharmila, in one of her many written statements from hospital custody
What 16 Years of a Hunger Strike Actually Looked Like
The mechanics of Irom Sharmila's hunger strike are important to understand because they reveal how the Indian state both contained her protest and inadvertently prolonged it.
The procedure was almost ritualistic. She would be arrested under Section 309, hospitalised, force-fed. After a period of custody (varying from weeks to a year), she would be released when the state determined there was no imminent threat to her life. The moment she walked out of the hospital, she would resume her fast. Within days or weeks, she would be re-arrested and the cycle would begin again. This continued, year after year, for over 500 weeks.
She lived entirely in hospital rooms. She could not vote (as an accused person in an ongoing criminal case, her civic rights were suspended). She met her mother — Sakhi Devi — only once during the entire 16 years, when her mother was admitted to the same hospital in 2009. She wrote poetry in Manipuri. She did yoga every day. She received international human rights awards — the Gwangju Prize for Human Rights in 2007, the Mayilamma Award in 2009, the Asian Human Rights Commission lifetime achievement award in 2010 — but could not physically travel to receive any of them.
And mainstream Indian media, for the most part, ignored her.
Why She Ended the Fast and What Happened Next
On July 26, 2016, Irom Sharmila announced in a Manipur court that she would end her hunger strike on August 9 — the anniversary of the Quit India Movement. She would contest the 2017 Manipur state assembly elections as an independent candidate from Thoubal constituency, the stronghold of then Chief Minister Okram Ibobi Singh.
Her reasoning was clear and had an honest logic to it. She had fasted for 16 years. AFSPA had not been repealed. The government had not blinked. "If AFSPA has not been repealed in 15 years of her fast then it won't happen in another 30 years also," her close associate Babloo Loitongbam said at the time. Sharmila herself cited "public apathy" — the inability of the civilian population to sustain pressure on the government — as a factor in her decision.
On August 9, 2016, in front of journalists and supporters, she broke her fast with a lick of honey — her first voluntary intake of food in 5,844 days. The nasal tube was removed for the last time. She was 44 years old.
The response from some quarters of Manipur's civil society was unexpectedly harsh. Some activists accused her of "abandoning" the cause. Protests were held outside the hospital. A section of the very community she had sacrificed sixteen years for felt she had let them down by choosing to eat and to seek political power. It was a painful moment that revealed how much of a symbolic burden had been placed on one woman's body.
On August 17, 2017 — in a quiet ceremony in Kodaikanal, Tamil Nadu — she married Desmond Anthony Coutinho, a British-born writer and activist of Indian origin, who had been her partner and supporter for years.
The Election Result That Broke Everything
In the February 2017 Manipur Legislative Assembly elections, Irom Sharmila contested from Thoubal — directly challenging Chief Minister Okram Ibobi Singh in his home constituency. She had no party machinery, no funds, and no experience of electoral politics. She ran on the single issue of AFSPA repeal.
She received 90 votes.
Okram Ibobi Singh won the seat with over 18,000 votes. Sharmila finished last among five candidates. It was one of the most lopsided defeats in recent Indian political history — and one of the most politically significant.
What did those 90 votes mean? Different people read it differently. Her critics said it proved that ordinary Manipuris — the very people she had claimed to fast for — did not actually support AFSPA repeal as a political priority when given the choice at a ballot. Her supporters countered that electoral politics in Manipur was controlled by money, ethnicity, and party machinery that no independent candidate could overcome, regardless of moral stature. Others noted that Thoubal was a Meitei-dominated constituency and that Sharmila — though Meitei herself — had been out of ordinary public life for 16 years and was simply unknown to most voters as a political figure, even if known as a symbol.
What is certain is this: the election result was emotionally devastating for Sharmila. She subsequently announced her withdrawal from active politics. She said she had seen enough of "the dirtiness involved in the process" and had no further interest in electoral participation.
Where Irom Sharmila Is Today
In 2019, Irom Sharmila gave birth to twin daughters. She and Desmond settled in Kerala. She has largely withdrawn from public life — there are occasional interviews, occasional public statements, but the relentless civic presence of the woman who fasted for 16 years is gone. She has spoken in interviews of the need to heal — physically, from 16 years of hospitalisation and force-feeding, and emotionally, from the weight of carrying an entire people's grief on her body for more than a decade and a half.
She was invited to the Bangalore Literature Festival in 2022 and used the occasion to speak on behalf of Varavara Rao, the Telugu poet then under house arrest. The instinct toward solidarity and civil society advocacy clearly has not disappeared — but it is expressed now in quieter, more personal ways.
In 2026, she is 54 years old. Her daughters are seven. She continues to write poetry in Manipuri.
AFSPA in 2026 — Still There, Still Contested
The law that Irom Sharmila fasted to repeal for 16 years is still in force in Manipur as of June 2026. But the landscape around it has shifted considerably.
| State / Region | AFSPA Status (2026) | Change since Sharmila's fast began |
|---|---|---|
| Mizoram | Withdrawn | Withdrawn 1986 — before her fast |
| Tripura | Withdrawn | Withdrawn 2015 — during her fast |
| Meghalaya | Withdrawn | Withdrawn 2018 — after her fast |
| Manipur (Imphal Valley) | Partially withdrawn, then reimposed | Gradual partial withdrawal 2004–2022; reimposed 2023 after ethnic violence |
| Nagaland | In force, renewed every 6 months | Unchanged |
| Assam (parts) | In force in specific districts | Reduced in scope but not removed |
| Jammu & Kashmir | In force (entire UT) | Extended post-Article 370 abrogation |
The partial withdrawals from Tripura, Meghalaya, and some Manipur districts represent a real, if incomplete, acknowledgement that AFSPA cannot be permanent in areas where security conditions have improved. But the reimposition in Manipur hill districts after the 2023 ethnic violence — which Sharmila's fast never achieved — was reversed by the same violence she had always said AFSPA enabled. There is a bitter circularity to this: AFSPA-era governance created the conditions for ethnic tension; ethnic violence justified AFSPA's reimposition.
We covered the Manipur crisis and its AFSPA dimension in detail in our June 2026 pillar post on AFSPA and Manipur. The short version: 258 dead, 60,000 displaced, the state divided along ethnic lines, and AFSPA still in force in the hill districts. The law that Sharmila fasted against for 16 years now shelters a new generation of allegations.
Her Legacy — What She Actually Changed
It is tempting to measure Irom Sharmila's legacy purely by whether AFSPA was repealed. By that metric, she failed. The law stands. But that framing is both too narrow and somewhat unfair to what she actually accomplished.
She made AFSPA impossible to ignore internationally. Before Sharmila's fast, AFSPA was virtually unknown outside human rights and academic circles. Her 16-year hunger strike — declared by Amnesty International as a prisoner of conscience, supported by Nobel laureate Shirin Ebadi, featured in TIME magazine, the Smithsonian, and newspapers across the world — made AFSPA a named, discussed, contested law on the global human rights agenda. That did not happen before her.
She documented and personalised what AFSPA meant. Before she fasted, she conducted interviews with survivors of rape and relatives of people killed under AFSPA's shelter as part of the Human Rights Alert citizen's inquiry. Her testimony gave names and faces to statistics. That documentation exists in the record permanently.
She kept the Northeast India human rights issue alive during its most invisible period. Between 2000 and 2012, when most of national India had forgotten that AFSPA even existed, Sharmila's hospitalised body was a reminder. The 2011 AFSPA review committee headed by Justice Jeevan Reddy — which recommended repeal — was constituted partly because her fast had made inaction politically expensive.
She demonstrated the limits of individual moral witness. This is perhaps the most uncomfortable part of her legacy. One woman fasting for 16 years, supported by international awards and global media attention, could not move the Indian state to change a security law it considered essential. That tells us something important about the limits of Gandhian moral pressure against a 21st-century democratic state that has become expert at absorbing symbolic protest without concession.
The Questions Her Life Leaves Unanswered
BUGLE does not believe in tidy conclusions on questions this complex. Here are the questions that Irom Sharmila's story leaves genuinely open:
Was ending the fast the right decision? The honest answer is: we don't know. If she had continued, AFSPA might still not have been repealed. Ending it allowed her to live, to marry, to have children, to heal. Whether that trade-off was "right" is not for anyone outside her own conscience to judge.
Did the Manipuris who gave her 90 votes betray her — or did they simply vote their interests? Electoral politics is not a referendum on moral stature. The people who voted for Okram Ibobi Singh were not endorsing AFSPA. They were voting for a known political figure who controlled government resources and local patronage. The question of why a 16-year symbol of sacrifice received 90 votes tells us more about how electoral democracy actually works than about the people of Thoubal.
Is the AFSPA fight over? No. The 2023 Manipur crisis has generated a new generation of civil society activists, international attention, Supreme Court monitoring, and parliamentary questions. The issue is more alive than it has been at any point since Sharmila's fast. But it is alive in a different form — dispersed, multi-focal, embedded in the broader crisis rather than concentrated in one person's body.
This post is part of BUGLE's Northeast India and civil rights series. Read our earlier coverage: Irom Sharmila's Fast — Part I (2011), Part II (2011), Part III (2011), and AFSPA and the Manipur Crisis — 2026 (June 2026).
If you have been following this story for a long time — or if this is the first time you are reading about Irom Sharmila — drop a comment below. BUGLE has been watching this story since 2011 and we read every response.
Comments